<aside> 🚨 Want more notes like this? Subscribe to weekly strategy emails: seonotebook.com

</aside>

Join the free SEO Notebook WhatsApp Channel:

https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vam2uVD2UPBCUJrUXj3T

Howdy Notebooker!

This week’s drop is all about sounding like an expert, and not just your average SEO.

Because when we provide historical context in our answers to client questions, we build credibility!

For example, let’s say your clients asks:

“Do backlinks still work in 2025?”

Don’t just say “yes.” Add context!

Year / Period What Happened
Pre-2012 / early 2010s Backlinks (especially high volume & keyword-rich anchor text) were a major ranking factor. Many “link farms,” poor quality directories, etc.
2012-2016 Penguin algorithm introduced (2012), and over time evolved to ignore/downgrade low-quality/manipulated links. (Ahrefs)
~2016 (“Penguin 4.0”) Google shifted so that many spammy or manipulative backlinks would be ignored rather than causing heavy penalties — making the effect of bad links less about punishment and more about “not helping.” (Ahrefs)
Post-2016 → 2020s Increasing focus on quality, relevance, content value, and user experience. Also more emphasis on “E-E-A-T” (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness) & how links factor into demonstrating authority and trust.
2023-2025 With AI, changing SERP features (zero-clicks, AI summaries), and more “content abundance,” merely having backlinks is insufficient; what counts is whether they are meaningful. Also more risk in manipulative tactics. Tools and best practices evolve to favor “earned, editorial, relevant” backlinks.

When explaining this to clients or leadership, you’ll want to frame the value clearly and set realistic expectations. Here’s how: